El Jefe
 Lieutenant
 Posts:494

 | | 16 May 2009 11:59 AM |
| I've run into a few MWC members who have ideas on rule changes. I thought this might be a good place to hash them out. For starters, here's a concern over ram rules that came up in SCRAP recently. The affected rules are:
"MWC:CBS.II.F: Since the goal of the hobby is to conduct safe surface
naval battles, other weapons such as mines, torpedoes, ram bow usage,
depth charges, rockets, fire, acids, bases, etc., are not allowed.
"MWC:CBS.III.C.5.c: The contest director will asses ram damage
penalties of 50 points for superstructure damage, 100 points for hull
damage above the waterline, and 200 points for hull damage below the
waterline." From the way the rule is written, it appears to be cumulative for rams that do damage to superstructure, above, and below the waterline. However, SCRAP has chosen to only count the single greatest type of damage received. For example, a ram that does above and below waterline damage would be assessed a penalty of 200 points rather than 300 points. One of the members has brought up the issue with MWC for a possible rule change to clarify the ambiguity. Any thoughts?
| | | |
|
bb26
 Rear Admiral (RDML)
 Posts:1641

 | | 17 May 2009 10:25 PM |
| I would think the 200 is fine but if the captain that performed the ram is involved in another incident, then his boat should be removed from the water and be assessed a penalty equivalent to a sink or 800 whichever is greater. | | | Just when you think you know the answers, I change the questions. | |
|
MWC13
 Midshipman
 Posts:44

 | | 30 May 2009 04:07 AM |
| That's beyond the scope of the rules. Forcing a ship off the water, because of excessive rams, hasn't been necessary as the rammer is often quite upset about the ram. Often as much as the ramee. Peer pressure often works well with this. Why I remember a certain Derfflinger stern punching out a panel on my SoDak. I didn't sink but the pump was fighting a losing battle when I got it to shore. I pointed at the captain who rammed me, laughed and told him he pooped like a girl.
| | Southern California Region Attack Patrol (SCRAP) http://www.scrapcombatships.com USS Blue Death USS Chester | |
|
Evil Joker Veteran
 Commander
 Posts:615

 | | 30 May 2009 10:06 AM |
| lol. ouch | | Southern California Region Attack Patrol (SCRAP) http://www.scrapcombatships.com
SMS Konig - Battle Ready
SMS Von der Tann - Battle Ready
DMB Scipione Africano - Battle Ready
DKM Prinz Eugen - Battle Ready | |
|
Iceman
 Rear Admiral (RDML)
 Posts:1186

 | | 30 May 2009 02:25 PM |
| IRCWCC just rolls with the area of most damage, not cumulative, a ram that would hit below and extend to above would just be a below (or do we just do a ram???) maybe I should look at that....... | | Rob A.
USS Alabama USS Arizona USS Saratoga
DKM Bismarck USS John Brown
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NYBG/ | |
|
froggyfrenchman
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2988

 | | 31 May 2009 12:10 PM |
| I am pretty sure that in most cases, the higher point penalty is assessed. So if there is damage both below, and above the water-line, then only the below penalty is assessed. Mikey
| | | |
|
Tugboat Veteran
 Admiral
 Posts:4438

 | | 21 Jun 2009 01:41 PM |
| I would think that in the scale of most battles, points-wise, 100 points either way wouldn't affect the outcome much. | | | |
|
froggyfrenchman
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2988

 | | 21 Jun 2009 04:06 PM |
| Tuggy Good to see you posting. I thought you had fallen off the face of the earth. Mikey | | | |
|
Tugboat Veteran
 Admiral
 Posts:4438

 | | 21 Jun 2009 04:36 PM |
| I have. A planet called nursing school, which consumes many, many hours to no good end. Also, clinical grades are entirely subjective, based on the mood of your instructor. So having a feminist instructor who thinks that I'm a smartypants doesn't help me. So I have to work my @$$ off to pass. I take some small comfort in knowing that on the 4 national level tests we've taken so far, I've been in the 99th percentile, which makes it hard for her to fail me  I graduate (hopefully) in September, and then the fun begins where I'm just working, not working and schooling. The last quarter is the easiest, so I should be on more. | | | |
|
froggyfrenchman
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2988

 | | 21 Jun 2009 04:52 PM |
| A little light at the end of the tunnel never hurt anyone. September will be here before you know it. Mikey | | | |
|
Tugboat Veteran
 Admiral
 Posts:4438

 | | 21 Jun 2009 05:40 PM |
| Light at the end of the tunnel is getting Evstafi on the pond, and getting a job to pay for the winter overhaul of the KGV that Pete Dmitri gave me... | | | |
|
Anachronus
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2183

 | | 21 Jun 2009 07:39 PM |
| Grad school has a way of sucking the life out of you. I am still interesting in Effy's brother if you can ever get free time.
| | | I am prepared to meet my maker, whether He is prepared for the ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
-Sir Winston- | |
|
BrianK Veteran
 Midshipman
 Posts:5

 | | 02 Dec 2009 07:32 PM |
| I am finally getting on to this site (been meaning to keep up with Justin's work here). I thought I'd mention 'Tuggy' did graduate, did pass the national certificatoin exam, and has been using post-class time now to make progress on a beautiful boat. Now he and i have our new joint-projects to work on this Winter. I'm still learning all the features of this site. I am off now to look for a Calendar (I know there are potential captains here who may not see our site, and want to be able to list build sessons, battles, etc here as well to keep our obsession (hobby) visible to as many people as possibl). BrianK | | | |
|
froggyfrenchman
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2988

 | | 02 Dec 2009 07:57 PM |
| Brian Good to see you on here. Mikey | | | |
|