USS Ohio A Treaty Group (group) project
Last Post 12 Apr 2012 11:35 AM by Stokamoto. 91 Replies.
AddThis - Bookmarking and Sharing ButtonPrinter Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrevNextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 5 of 5 << < 12345
AuthorMessages
StokamotoUser is Offline
Stokomoto
Admiral
Admiral
Send Private Message
Posts:4019
Avatar

--
12 Oct 2011 06:11 AM
I remember that site. There's an official model of that ship too but it doesn't show the 2nd funnel being taller than the first. Is your 2nd funnel going to be taller than the first one? I think the 2nd funnel being taller takes the look away for sure howeve it is interesting. Either way it's a great looking ship. Motion Models version is the most detailed version I have seen yet though. Your plan doesn't show the rear funnel being taller though.
Bismarck Yamato Roma Missouri
RCENGRUser is Offline
Veteran
Ensign
Ensign
Send Private Message
Posts:271
Avatar

--
12 Oct 2011 03:34 PM

The second funnel is shorter than the first, by about 1/4" - 3/8", which follows the plans I had.  I looks like it is considerably taller on the plastic model.  Side views I have from other sources show the back funnel as either even or slightly shorter than the front stack.

Mark

USS Roanoke, HMS Queen

Thunder ChickenUser is Offline
Midshipman
Midshipman
Send Private Message
Posts:7
Avatar

--
07 Dec 2011 11:24 PM
Posted By RCENGR on 12 Oct 2011 12:07 AM

If you want a good source to use when constructing a Montana, go to this website: http://www.motionmodels.com/ships/bb/bb67.html The pictures of the model on the website are what I used to help interpret the plans and they have lots of detail.

I didn't use foam for the superstructure, I used 3/4" poplar wood.  Sides are cut 1/4" thick so that the interior is hollow.  I didn't take any pictures when I was putting it together, but you can look at the pictures of the 01 level earlier in this thread to get an idea how I did it.

This project looks great! I would urge caution referencing that website. It doesn't look very accurate, the aft stack and the bridge area in particular look off. The Montanas would have reverted to a separate wheel house from the armored conning tower arrangement such as seen in the North Carlonias. This is confirmed in the various pictures of the official models and even the offical painting. I do think that the squared off bridge arrangement as seen on the Iowas (starting with Missouri) is better looking from pure aesthetic perspective! Either rate I hope this project is still active and love to seen and recent progress photos.


 

froggyfrenchmanUser is Offline
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Send Private Message
Posts:3011
Avatar

--
12 Dec 2011 06:06 AM
There are some battle photos of this monster in the photos section on this site.
Xenia, Ohio November battle thread, and the fall regionals Xenia, thread.
Mikey
NikkiUser is Online
Captain
Captain
Send Private Message
Posts:990
Avatar

--
12 Dec 2011 08:26 AM
Hey Mikey,
How is the monster doing??
Nikki
The mighty beast is wounded, a Swordfish torpedoed the steering gear, with rudder's jammed..is his Achilles Heel with... K.G.5 and Rodney closing in for the kill". From "You Must Sink The Bismarck" on youtube.. On a sidenote, That line is true :D
Thunder ChickenUser is Offline
Midshipman
Midshipman
Send Private Message
Posts:7
Avatar

--
12 Dec 2011 10:17 PM
Posted By froggyfrenchman on 12 Dec 2011 06:06 AM
There are some battle photos of this monster in the photos section on this site.
Xenia, Ohio November battle thread, and the fall regionals Xenia, thread.
Mikey

Very cool. She looks great. The next and most important question is how did she do in Treaty?



 

BoatmeisterUser is Offline
Veteran
Ensign
Ensign
Send Private Message
Posts:74
Avatar

--
13 Dec 2011 12:34 PM
She does very well. As with most new ships there are some things that need worked out but she is stable, very manoverable and tough as nails.
Thunder ChickenUser is Offline
Midshipman
Midshipman
Send Private Message
Posts:7
Avatar

--
17 Dec 2011 12:51 AM
Very cool, thanks! Is it possible at this point to determine how she stacks up against the other large BBs?
DustinUser is Offline
Veteran
Ensign
Ensign
Send Private Message
Posts:290
Avatar

--
01 Feb 2012 12:29 PM
Mikey ran her against Matt's H-39 and came out on top IIRC. That result may have had to do with experience of the captain, so YMMV.
Treaty:
IJN Kirishima (Stricken)
FNS Volta (on hold)
FNS Alsace (under construction)
DKM Ludendorff [O-Class BC] (planned)

Battlestations:
FNS Mogador (Striken)
HMS Gustav V (Order placed)

Big Gun:
FNS Richelieu (Stricken)
NikkiUser is Online
Captain
Captain
Send Private Message
Posts:990
Avatar

--
05 Mar 2012 10:39 PM
I love what mikey said about that battle!!!!
Nikki
The mighty beast is wounded, a Swordfish torpedoed the steering gear, with rudder's jammed..is his Achilles Heel with... K.G.5 and Rodney closing in for the kill". From "You Must Sink The Bismarck" on youtube.. On a sidenote, That line is true :D
froggyfrenchmanUser is Offline
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Send Private Message
Posts:3011
Avatar

--
11 Apr 2012 07:20 PM
I had someone asking questions about how I made the skegs on this project. So I thought I would post more info here.

The skegs are made out of three pieces of aircraft plywood.
The two outer pieces are 1/16" ply, and their main purpose is to align the center piece when it is cut in two.
The two outer pieces can be any thickness. I used 1/16" ply in order to keep the thickness of the skegs to a minimum.

The inner piece of aircraft plywood is 1/4" thick. It's main purpose is to house the stuffing tube and keep it aligned during
installation, and then to give it strength in order to help protect the shaft from damage that might occur during transporting
the ship from table to the water, or loading into the van and such.
I used 1/4" thick plywood, as that was the outer diameter of the stuffing tubes I used.
The inner piece starts out as one piece, but I traced out the area where the stuffing tubes would be located, and then cut
that part out. At this point there are two inner pieces. The upper piece, and the lower piece.
I had drilled holes in the assembly so that I could install screws to hold the inner pieces in place after the stuffing tube section
was removed.
I took my stuffing tubes which were about 1/2" longer than the skegs, so that I could leave about 1/4" protruding at each end
of the skegs in order to avoid getting epoxy in the tubes themselves.
I scuffed up the stuffing tubes with heavy grit sandpaper so that the epoxy would be able to get a good grip.
After making sure that everything lined up correctly, I took them apart, and applied the epoxy to all of the surfaces, and re-assembled them.
After installing the screws, I clamped everything as well.
After everything was cured, I removed the screws, and filled in the holes with bondo.

In order to make sure that the skegs remained in place while installing them in the hull, I cut slits in the hull that were shorter than the skegs,
so that when the hull was upside-down, the skegs would drop into the slits, but not fall through.

I then prepaired some spruce strips to help anchor the skegs to the inside of the hull. I cut relief slits in the spruce similar to what some folks
do when installing a sub-deck. That way the strips could be easily bent to follow the contour of the hull.
The skegs were then installed with bondo with some clean areas left for super-glue in order to tack things in place while the bondo cured.
I then installed the strips with epoxy and super-glue. When everything was finshed setting up, I hit everything again with epoxy to seal it.

I feel like the skegs are plenty strong. But they can also be re-enforced on the inside if need be.
I do wish I had taken the time to clean things up a bit on the inside of the hull before applying the epoxy, but I was running behind schedule
on the project, and skipped that.
Hope this helps.
Mikey
StokamotoUser is Offline
Stokomoto
Admiral
Admiral
Send Private Message
Posts:4019
Avatar

--
12 Apr 2012 11:35 AM
Thanks for the info Mikey. I will be starting the NC soon so this is going to be helpful.
Bismarck Yamato Roma Missouri
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 5 of 5 << < 12345


Active Forums 4.1
You must be logged in to use this module.