BoomerBoy17
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2099

 | | 25 Sep 2008 03:40 PM | | I know its large, but it has 4 units and moves at 24 seconds. Any idea on feasibility of buying one(especially if someone knows where to get it), and building it, for a rookie. Good or bad: gun positions, turning, size, ect? Thanks for the help.
| | | Even though I walk
through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil,
-Psalm 23. | |
|
slow_and_ugly Veteran
 Ensign
 Posts:231

 | | 25 Sep 2008 04:02 PM | | It won't work for IRCWCC because it's no faster than battleships, and it has a smaller rudder (single - class 4). I know of several other large class 4 ships and the weren't successful.
It might work better under Treaty rules because it's so fast that nothing big can catch it. (well almost nothing -- Iowa can catch it and eat it) | | | |
|
BoomerBoy17
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2099

 | | 25 Sep 2008 04:36 PM | | oh, ok, its just that ur thread piqued my interest, so i thought i'd ask. Thanks | | | Even though I walk
through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil,
-Psalm 23. | |
|
the frog
 Ensign
 Posts:228

 | | 25 Sep 2008 07:10 PM | | Mikey is running that ship with great sucess quote: Originally posted by BoomerBoy17
oh, ok, its just that ur thread piqued my interest, so i thought i'd ask. Thanks
| | | |
|
BoomerBoy17
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2099

 | | 26 Sep 2008 02:52 AM | | But mikey isnt a rookie, is he? Most likely has much more experience then i do | | | Even though I walk
through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil,
-Psalm 23. | |
|
Chris Easterbrook
 Rear Admiral (RDML)
 Posts:1391

 | | 26 Sep 2008 02:58 AM | | Under the combat X sysytem Curt is devolping the Renoun as will all battle cruisers will be usefull part of the problem is the class system of only a class 4 in IRCWCC but she is in the same weight class as scharnhorst which is a class 5.5 there is somethig wrong with this as scharnhorst is a battlecrusier not a battleship as the IRCWCC lists it. If you go to there list by weight in the construction rules Renoun would be a class 5 and would recieve a larger rudder and could defend herself better as she would have 4 cannons. As it says in the consruction rule in section H part 2 and I quote " Listed below are the authorized classes for combat ships and the total offensive/defensive units allowed. This list takes precedence over any entries shown in the Ship List." So useing this Renoun would be a class 5 not a class 4.
| | | That which does not kill me, makes me stronger. | |
|
BoomerBoy17
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2099

 | | 26 Sep 2008 03:11 AM | | It seems like every ship i look at would be better under Curt's system. That may be saying something. | | | Even though I walk
through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil,
-Psalm 23. | |
|
crzyhawk
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2249

 | | 26 Sep 2008 05:42 AM | | "as scharnhorst is a battlecrusier not a battleship as the IRCWCC lists it"
This is not true. The Germans always called her a "schlachtshiff" which is a battleship. The BRITISH were the only ones who rated her as a battlecrusier, and as per RN convention this seems to be based on speed rather then any combination of characteristics, as they did G3 and even Vanguard as a fully armoured battlecruiser.
Also, 11.1" guns count as capital ship guns so regardless of what anyone says about her trading gun power for speed, she is in BB realms with both firepower and protection (14 inch main belt), and thus Scharnhorst is a battleship regardless of what the British called her. | | | HMS Invincible
USS Salem (CA-139)
USS Belleau Wood (CVL-24)
| |
|
crzyhawk
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2249

 | | 26 Sep 2008 08:37 AM | | Mikey Deskin's Renown did fairly well in Treaty, but that's a far cry from how it would do in the IRCWCC. In treaty, I think the WW1 version is a bit better because of it's speed advantage. The WW2 version at 30 knots can be run down easily by Bismarks and Scharnhorsts, not to mention several of the hypos out there that people could build if they wanted to.
In the IRCWCC, it would be a floating target to soak up damage and drag down the Allied team. I would not recommend one for a rookie. | | | HMS Invincible
USS Salem (CA-139)
USS Belleau Wood (CVL-24)
| |
|
the frog
 Ensign
 Posts:228

 | | 26 Sep 2008 08:38 AM | | Scharnhorst is a battle ship in every sence of the word quote: Originally posted by Chris Easterbrook
Under the combat X sysytem Curt is devolping the Renoun as will all battle cruisers will be usefull part of the problem is the class system of only a class 4 in IRCWCC but she is in the same weight class as scharnhorst which is a class 5.5 there is somethig wrong with this as scharnhorst is a battlecrusier not a battleship as the IRCWCC lists it. If you go to there list by weight in the construction rules Renoun would be a class 5 and would recieve a larger rudder and could defend herself better as she would have 4 cannons. As it says in the consruction rule in section H part 2 and I quote " Listed below are the authorized classes for combat ships and the total offensive/defensive units allowed. This list takes precedence over any entries shown in the Ship List." So useing this Renoun would be a class 5 not a class 4.
| | | |
|
Stokamoto Stokomoto
 Admiral
 Posts:4014

 | | 26 Sep 2008 10:18 AM | | quote: Originally posted by BoomerBoy17
I know its large, but it has 4 units and moves at 24 seconds. Any idea on feasibility of buying one(especially if someone knows where to get it), and building it, for a rookie. Good or bad: gun positions, turning, size, ect? Thanks for the help.
Renown under Combat-X Renown full displacement falls within the >30,000-<34,999 tonnage range under BattleCruisers. This allows Renown to have 6 units. You can mount a max of 4 cannons in a side quadrant or bow or stern quadrants. Keep in mind one firing cannon has to remain in a side quadrant. Wouldn't want your entire broadside to be undefended. The ship's speed in the Combat-x speed chart shows that it had a 30kt speed which would give it 24 sec speed. Also your bow and stern quadrants are 60 degree arcs with 30 degree segmments port and stbd of the centerline. Renown also carried Torps . You can subdivide one cannon unit into a 25 unit cannon spurt/torpedoe and use the remaining unit as a 1/2 unit pump or another torpedoe spurt, or just a straight 25 mag shot cannon. Some options here. | | | Bismarck
Yamato
Roma
Missouri | |
|
Stokamoto Stokomoto
 Admiral
 Posts:4014

 | | 26 Sep 2008 10:29 AM | | quote: Originally posted by BoomerBoy17
I know its large, but it has 4 units and moves at 24 seconds. Any idea on feasibility of buying one(especially if someone knows where to get it), and building it, for a rookie. Good or bad: gun positions, turning, size, ect? Thanks for the help.
Renown under Combat-X Renown full displacement falls within the >30,000-<34,999 tonnage range under BattleCruisers. This allows Renown to have 6 units. You can mount a max of 4 cannons in a side quadrant or bow or stern quadrants. Keep in mind one firing cannon has to remain in a side quadrant. Wouldn't want your entire broadside to be undefended. The ship's speed in the Combat-x speed chart shows that it had a 30kt speed which would give it 24 sec speed. Also your bow and stern quadrants are 60 degree arcs with 30 degree segmments port and stbd of the centerline. Renown also carried Torps . You can subdivide one cannon unit into a 25 unit cannon spurt/torpedoe and use the remaining unit as a 1/2 unit pump or another torpedoe spurt, or just a straight 25 mag shot cannon. Some options here. You can mount your torp system on the broadside in approx location of the actual torps. The downangle has to be 20 degrees or greater. [:)] | | | Bismarck
Yamato
Roma
Missouri | |
|
Chris Easterbrook
 Rear Admiral (RDML)
 Posts:1391

 | | 26 Sep 2008 12:45 PM | | How do you say that Scharnhoarst is a battleship when the German navy even listed her as a Battlecruiser, yes she had better armor than most battlecruisers but her main guns were very underpowered at only 11" guns, Janes and most other sources list scharnhorst as a battlecuiser. I for one in a real world situation had to choose between Scharny or Renoun I would choose Renoun for her ability to hit hard and she was the same speed but had less armor, this is a miss match if I have heard of one, while Scharny could fire more often she would be hard pressed to damage Renoun but Renouns 15" guns would have not trouble damaging Scharny but that is my opion. | | | That which does not kill me, makes me stronger. | |
|
crzyhawk
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2249

 | | 26 Sep 2008 04:46 PM | | I'm not sure where you got your information from, but the Germans most assuredly did NOT call her a battlecruiser. Jane's and Conway's are both British publications, and any mis-classifications they make often get carried on. They were called schlactshiff, not schlactkruezer (a designation NEVER used by the Germans BTW, even the ww1 BCs were called grossekreuzer or large cruiser).
http://german-navy.de/kriegsmarine/ships/battleships/gneisenau/history.html
http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-fornv/germany/gersh-s/scharn2.htm
| | | HMS Invincible
USS Salem (CA-139)
USS Belleau Wood (CVL-24)
| |
|
the frog
 Ensign
 Posts:228

 | | 26 Sep 2008 05:45 PM | | I believe the original criteria for designation was that a battle cruiser had bb guns and cruiser speed and armor.I believe the scharny had heavier armor than the bismark.The germans originally called the scharny by the designation battleship "p" I believe. It even sais so in conways description quote: Originally posted by Chris Easterbrook
How do you say that Scharnhoarst is a battleship when the German navy even listed her as a Battlecruiser, yes she had better armor than most battlecruisers but her main guns were very underpowered at only 11" guns, Janes and most other sources list scharnhorst as a battlecuiser. I for one in a real world situation had to choose between Scharny or Renoun I would choose Renoun for her ability to hit hard and she was the same speed but had less armor, this is a miss match if I have heard of one, while Scharny could fire more often she would be hard pressed to damage Renoun but Renouns 15" guns would have not trouble damaging Scharny but that is my opion.
| | | |
|
Chris Easterbrook
 Rear Admiral (RDML)
 Posts:1391

 | | 27 Sep 2008 03:15 AM | | After doing more research I have found that both classifications are relevent as she could be the most heavily armored battlecruiser or the most unser gunned battleship built after world war one. The two ships of that class were intended to recive 6 15" guns in dual mounts but it was never completed. the dutch had designed a battlecuiser off of the Scharnhorst class but it was never completed, that and other sources including the german naval archive have rated Schanhorst as a battlecuiser. The other thing I would like to add is that most nations were afraid of using the title of battlecruiser after the first world war, even the US called the Alaska class a Large Cruiser when in fact she was a battlecruiser. You could talk to 10 different naval historians and get 10 different answers as to the question was the Schanhorst class a battleship or battlecruiser. The germans even reclassified the deutschland class to a heavy cruiser during the war dropping the title of pocket battleship. | | | That which does not kill me, makes me stronger. | |
|
Gettysburg114th [ROLES:Veteran]
 Rear Admiral (RDML)
 Posts:1639

 | | 27 Sep 2008 05:22 AM | | The key is to build a ship that you like. If you like the Renown you should build it. There are many people in the hobby that have built ships because, "they were the ship to have" and were never happy running that ship. Then there were people that ran the "ships to have" and liked them. I guess it all comes down to what you want out of the hobby. | | | Uberpooperscooper Bobo
DKM Bismarck (battle ready)
IJN Yamato (Dockyards IJN Kirishima (Dockyards) IJN Mogami (Dockyards)
IJN Agano (Dockyards) SMS Lutzow (Dockyards) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TreatyCombat/
| |
|
BoomerBoy17
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2099

 | | 27 Sep 2008 07:29 AM | | Well, ive always wanted to do a small British cruiser, but i hear so much against it, that it doesnt seem right. | | | Even though I walk
through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil,
-Psalm 23. | |
|
Stokamoto Stokomoto
 Admiral
 Posts:4014

 | | 27 Sep 2008 07:43 AM | | Like what for example? What small British Cruiser are you referring to? | | | Bismarck
Yamato
Roma
Missouri | |
|
TheMackster
 Ensign
 Posts:173

 | | 27 Sep 2008 08:06 AM | | I'm building my class 3, 3 unit Kent class British cruiser. It's going to be fun trying to stay alive with it, but if the big boys want to close in and blast me I'll have a couple of spurt guns (aka torpedoes) waiting for them.
They may nail me but they won't enjoy it. LOL | | | |
|