Tugboat Veteran
 Admiral
 Posts:4539

 | | 07 Feb 2011 07:50 PM | | LoL! | | | Battling: SMS Scharnhorst, SMS Baden
Building: HMS KGV (Drives, pumps water, guns are in but not plumbed)
MN Edgar Quinet (Hull done)
Drydock/Mothballed: Rus Evstafi, DKM Lutzow, HMS Invincible
Plus 20-odd other projects, according to my Boy Scouts who thoughtfully counted them for me. | |
|
Kotori87
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2343

 | | 08 Feb 2011 01:10 AM | | When you pick which predread to mold, try to choose one that would be good in Big Gun, as well. Mikasa would be ideal, at 36" length and two pairs of 12" guns, but I'm already building her. Just about any other predread of similar size, with guns 11" or larger and armor 6" or thicker would be great. Just don't go too much bigger than the Mikasa or it'll lose its appeal compared to early dreadnoughts, or too much smaller or it'll be impossible to build in Big Gun. | | | There are 101 different types of people: those who understand binary, those who don't, and those who just can't count... | |
|
RichelieuBB Veteran
 Rear Admiral (RDML)
 Posts:1417

 | | 08 Feb 2011 10:31 AM | | Is the Mikasa legal for fast gun clubs? | | Mike Mangus
Beware the French Revolution! Operational:
HMS Erin DN
FN Richelieu BB
FN Verite PDN
Launched
Le Requin Xebec (AoS)
Under Construction:
FN Mogador DE
FN Gascogne BB (Treaty)
FN Bretagne (1/96) (delayed)
Mothballed:
FN Bearn CV
| |
|
Anachronus
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2286

 | | 08 Feb 2011 11:12 AM | | Not MWC, she is too old. The cut off date is 1905. She is fine for Treaty though. | | | Vive la France! | |
|
absolutek
 Lieutenant
 Posts:430

 | | 08 Feb 2011 11:13 AM | | | | Chase H.
IRCWCC:
Battle Ready Ships: SMS VDT & USS Juneau
Under Construction: Henri IV & DKM Gneisenau | |
|
| |
|
Steve Tyng Veteran
 Ensign
 Posts:245

 | | 08 Feb 2011 12:19 PM | | Posted By RichelieuBB on 08 Feb 2011 10:31 AM
Is the Mikasa legal for fast gun clubs? I think Steve Andrews is using a Mikasa as a radio box in his new Vanguard!  | | | |
|
Kotori87
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2343

 | | 08 Feb 2011 07:55 PM | | It seems kinda strange to me that Fast Gun clubs would exclude every ship that fought in the only decisive battleship fleet action of the 20th century. Then again, I'm not in a Fast Gun club, so why should I complain? I'm sure there are other predreadnoughts that would work just fine. I just need to dig them up out of my handy-dandy Predreadnought Stats Spreadsheet:
http://www.rcnavalcombat.com/Portals/0/Users/Kotori87/WWCC%20Predreadnought%20Warship%20List.xls | | | There are 101 different types of people: those who understand binary, those who don't, and those who just can't count... | |
|
absolutek
 Lieutenant
 Posts:430

 | | 08 Feb 2011 10:25 PM | | I've brought up the issue the last two years when people start talking about rules changes in the IRCWCC, and there seems to be no interest whatsoever in changing the dates of ships allowed. It was even commented that there are plenty of ships nobody has ever built already in the shiplist. I would be happy if instead of relying on launch dates, we could build ships that were in commision between 1905-1946. --Chase | | Chase H.
IRCWCC:
Battle Ready Ships: SMS VDT & USS Juneau
Under Construction: Henri IV & DKM Gneisenau | |
|
| |
|
Anachronus
 Rear Admiral (RADM)
 Posts:2286

 | | 08 Feb 2011 10:40 PM | | I don't understand it either. There is a strong WW2 bias, which I suspect is due to the easier access to plans of the Second world war vintage than to those of the first and earlier. | | | Vive la France! | |
|